Calcutta HC orders immediate replacement of ED officer heading school job case

Kolkata, Sep 29 (IANS) Calcutta High Court’s single-judge bench of Justice Amrita Sinha on Friday ordered immediate replacement of Enforcement Directorate (ED)’s Assistant Director Mithilesh Kumar Mishra as the team of the central agency team probing the multi-crore cash for school job case in West Bengal.

Justice Sinha also asked the ED Director to ensure the replacement by October 3, the day ED has summoned Trinamool Congress General Secretary and party Lok Sabha member Abhishek Banerjee at the agency’s Salt Lake office in the northern outskirts of Kolkata.

However, Banerjee has clarified morning that he will not be honouring the summon.

Justice Sinha also observed that Mishra cannot be assigned to any kind of investigation on any money laundering case in West Bengal.

Senior advocate and CPI(M) Rajya Sabha member Bikas Ranjan Bhattacharya pointed out to the court aboutAbhishek Banerjee’s intimation through this X (formerly Twitter) handle of not honouring the ED summon on October 3 because of political preoccupations at New Delhi.

On that Justice Sinha directed ED that their scheduled investigation process should not be hampered at any cost and for the sake of carrying forward the investigation the central agency will have the liberty to take any step as per legal provisions.

Justice Sinha clearly observed that the court has lost confidence in the efficiency of the ED official concerned in carrying forward the smooth progress of the investigation in the school job case.

Justice Sinha recently expressed dissatisfaction over the mode of investigation spearheaded by Mishra and also asked him whether he wanted relief from the investigation.

During the earlier hearing in the matter on September 25, Mishra also faced the ire of Justice Sinha for submitting incomplete details on the assets and properties of Abhishek Banerjee.

She took exception to why the central agency mentioned only about three insurance policies of Banerjee in its report.

“There is no mention of his bank account details in your report. Is it possible that he has no bank account? It seems that you are also not aware of his exact residential address,” Justice Sinha said on September 25.

Disclaimer: This story has not been edited by the Sakshi Post team and is auto-generated from syndicated feed.