YS Jagan Attack: Can Chandrababu Answer These Questions?  

YS Jagan Mohan Reddy, Chandrababu Naidu - Sakshi Post

Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu has taken politics to a new low not simply in Andhra Pradesh or South India, but in the entire country, analysts say. His intrigues and conspiracies, observers point out, can find a parallel only among those of the worst dictators of the world or ISI generals and tinpot despots of Latin America. His reaction to the despicable, murderous attack on Leader Of Opposition in Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly, YS Jagan Mohan Reddy, has been seen as a reflection of his megalomania, arrogance, intolerance and insecurity.

Several unanswered questions emerge from this dastardly attempt on YS Jagan's life. Chandrababu Naidu has to answer every single question among these. A few of them are ...

How did Srinivasa Rao, the waiter who stabbed the YSRCP chief smuggle a sharp knife used in cockfights into the high secure airport zone?

Why did Chandrababu Naidu's party leaders, the AP director general of police and others go into an overdrive in trying to paint the attacker as a ardent follower and fan of YS Jagan?

Why would a fan come armed with a knife when he wants a selfie?

Why did the DGP who was quick to reveal the attacker's name, caste and label him as a fan of the AP Leader of Opposition not reveal the identity of the canteen contractor? Is it not a fact that the canteen contractor was an aspirant for TDP ticket for the Gajuwaka Assembly Constituency?

why did the DGP not ask for questioning of the canteen contractor and pronounce his findings even before probing the matter on the surface level?

Why was Srinivasa Rao, the attacker not produced before the media so that he could reveal his true intentions in the conspiracy underlying this vicious attack?

Why would the canteen contractor, Harshavardhan Prasad, employ a YSRCP activist as they claim Srinivasa Rao to be who did not clear his intermediate exam, when it is widely known that the TDP government denies even widow pensions to YSRCP supporters in villages across the state?

Why does the morphed flexi not carry pictures of other local YSRCP leaders if Srinivasa Rao was indeed a YSRCP supporter and if he flexi was authentic. Isn't it customary for flexis everywhere to have photographs of the local leaders apart from party bigwigs as also sport party colours? Why isn't the phone number of the flexi maker or Srinivasa Rao, the attacker, for that matter not mentioned in the flexi which is normally the case everywhere?

On what basis have TDP leaders and their media outlets come to the conclusion that Srinivasa Rao is a fan when this is not substantiated by any concrete evidence?

While the government sources claim that the attacker had been employed at the airport canteen for a year now, the truth of the matter is that he had joined only a fortnight ago. Is this not true? Why doesn't the DGP, who responds with uncharacteristic alacrity on the attack, not discuss this point or come forward to probe it?

Why is it that the DGP who swung into operation clarification and cover-up with such swiftness not reveal details of interrogation of the attacker, Srinivasa Rao?

Why is Chandrababu Naidu offering lame explanations social media stating that the area where the attack took place is under the Centre's authority? Can anything be more puerile from someone who claims to have 40 years of political experience and who at the drop of a hat, says that he is senior to even Prime Minister Narendra Modi?

It is being said that pictures of the attacker Srinivasa Rao being accorded royal treatment in police custody after the murder attempt on YS Jagan's life are doing the rounds on social media. How do you explain the government machinery warming up to him?

These are a few questions which Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Nara Chandrababu Naidu needs to respond to with the same promptness which he showed in ridiculing the cowardly on YS Jagan's life and portraying it as an attack carried out by his fan.

How did the attacker manage to carry a 11-page letter in his pocket without folding it? Why does the handwriting vary in the last few pages of the letter? Is it because more than one person had to quickly scribble eleven pages which were not folded?

Also Read:Attack On AP Leader Of Opposition, YS Jagan Mohan Reddy Pre-Planned

whatsapp channel


Read More:

Advertisement
Back to Top